References
Egorova M.A., Churilov A.V., et al. Possibilities of visual and automated cardiotocogram analysis for assessment of fetal state in complicated pregnancy. Mediko-sotsialniye problemy semyi, 2017, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.)
Amadori R., Vaianella E., et al. Intrapartum cardiotocography: an exploratory analysis of interpretational variation. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022, Vol. 42, № 7, pp. 2753–2757. DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2109131
Asfaw D., Jordanov I., et al. Multimodal deep learning for predicting adverse birth outcomes based on early labour data. Bioengineering, 2023, Vol. 10, № 6, 730. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10060730
Ayres-de-Campos D., Rei M., et al. SisPorto 4.0 — computer analysis following the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2017, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 62–67. DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1161750
Ben M'Barek I., Ben M'Barek B., et al. Large-scale analysis of interobserver agreement and reliability in cardiotocography interpretation during labor using an online tool. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2024, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 136. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06322-4
Bhatia M., Mahtani K. R., et al. A cross-sectional comparison of three guidelines for intrapartum cardiotocography. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2017, Vol. 138, No. 1, pp. 89–93. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12161
Chandraharan E., Griffiths K., et al. Physiological interpretation of cardiotocograph (CTG): inter-observer and "observer-AI" agreements in recognising types of fetal hypoxic stress. Medical Research Archives, 2024, Vol. 12, No. 11. DOI: 10.18103/mra.v12i11.5980
Cömert Z., Kocamaz A. F. A novel software for comprehensive analysis of cardiotocography signals "CTG-OAS". 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). 2017, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/IDAP.2017.8090210
Daydulo Y.D., Thamineni B.L., et al. Deep learning based fetal distress detection from time frequency representation of cardiotocogram signal using Morse wavelet. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2022, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 329. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02068-1
Feng J., Liang J., et al. A hybrid stacked ensemble and kernel SHAP-based model for intelligent cardiotocography classification and interpretability. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2023, Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 273. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02378-y
Francis F., Luz S., Wu H., et al. Detecting intrapartum fetal hypoxia from cardiotocography using machine learning. 2022 Computing in Cardiology, 2022, Vol. 49, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.22489/CinC.2022.339
Francis F., Luz S., et al. Machine learning to classify cardiotocography for fetal hypoxia detection. 2023 45th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). 2023, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340803
Garabedian C., Butruille L., et al. Inter-observer reliability of 4 fetal heart rate classifications. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 2017, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 131–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2016.11.002
Hruban L., Spilka J., et al. Agreement on intrapartum cardiotocogram recordings between expert obstetricians. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2015, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 694–702. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12368
Ignatov P.N., Lutomski J.E. Quantitative cardiotocography to improve fetal assessment during labor: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 2016, Vol. 205, pp. 91–97. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.023
Innab N., Alsubai S., et al. Automated approach for fetal and maternal health management using light gradient boosting model with SHAP explainable AI. Frontiers in Public Health, 2024, Vol. 12, pp. 1462693. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1462693
Khan M.J., Vatish M., et al. PatchCTG: a patch cardiotocography transformer for antepartum fetal health monitoring. Sensors, 2025, Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 2650. DOI: 10.3390/s25092650
Kling D., Rehnström M., et al. Performance of five cardiotocography classification templates in labor: a cohort study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2024, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 2394845. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2394845
Kundu S., Kuehnle E., et al. Estimation of neonatal outcome artery pH value according to CTG interpretation of the last 60 min before delivery: a retrospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, Vol. 296, No. 5, pp. 897–905. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-017-4516-4
Ma'sum M.A., Riskyana Dewi Intan P., et al. Improving deep learning classifier for fetus hypoxia detection in cardiotocography signal. 2019 International Workshop on Big Data and Information Security (IWBIS). 2019, pp. 51–56. DOI: 10.1109/IWBIS.2019.8935835
Martí Gamboa S., Giménez O.R., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the FIGO and the 5-tier fetal heart rate classification systems in the detection of neonatal acidemia. American Journal of Perinatology, 2017, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 508–514. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593810
Mendis L., Palaniswami M., et al. Rapid detection of fetal compromise using input length invariant deep learning on fetal heart rate signals. Scientific Reports, 2024, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 12615. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63108-6
Mendis L., Karmakar D., et al. Cross-database evaluation of deep learning methods for intrapartum cardiotocography classification. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2025, Vol. 13, pp. 123–135. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2025.3548401
Nagendra V., Gude H., et al. Evaluation of support vector machines and random forest classifiers in a real-time fetal monitoring system based on cardiotocography data. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB). 2017, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/CIBCB.2017.8058546
Nazli I., Korbeko E., et al. Early detection of fetal health conditions using machine learning for classifying imbalanced cardiotocographic data. Diagnostics, 2025, Vol. 15, No. 10, pp. 1250. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15101250
Neri S., Ramirez Zegarra R., et al. Interobserver agreement of intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation by midwives using current FIGO and physiology-based guidelines. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2024, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 2425758. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2024.2425758
Neri S., Ramirez Zegarra R., et al. Interobserver agreement among midwives in cardiotocography interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a retrospective study. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2025, p. 70687. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.70687
Ogasawara J., Ikenoue S., et al. Deep neural network-based classification of cardiotocograms outperformed conventional algorithms. Scientific Reports, 2021, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 13367. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92805-9
Öztürk S., Şahin S.A., et al. A novel approach for cardiotocography paper digitization and classification for abnormality detection. IEEE Access, 2023, Vol. 11, pp. 42521–42533. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3271137
Park T.J., Chang H.J., et al. Machine learning model for classifying the results of fetal cardiotocography conducted in high-risk pregnancies. Yonsei Medical Journal, 2022, Vol. 63, No. 7, pp. 692–700. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.7.692
Petrozziello A., Jordanov I., et al. Deep learning for continuous electronic fetal monitoring in labor. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2018, pp. 5866–5869. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513625
Petrozziello A., Redman C.W.G., et al. Multimodal convolutional neural networks to detect fetal compromise during labor and delivery. IEEE Access, 2019, Vol. 7, pp. 112026–112036. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2933368
Pradhan A.K., Rout J.K., et al. A machine learning approach for the prediction of fetal health using CTG. 2021 19th OITS International Conference on Information Technology (OCIT). 2021, pp. 239–244. DOI: 10.1109/OCIT53463.2021.00056
Rei M., Tavares S., et al. Interobserver agreement in CTG interpretation using the 2015 FIGO guidelines for intrapartum fetal monitoring. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2016, Vol. 205, pp. 27–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.08.017
Rovas L., Minkauskiene M., et al. Interobserver agreement: individual CTG features show better agreement among investigators than the overall CTG assessment in cases of meconium-stained amniotic fluid. European Journal of Midwifery, 2025, Vol. 9, pp. 55. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/215682
Sabiani L., Le Dû R., et al. Intra- and interobserver agreement among obstetric experts in court regarding the review of abnormal fetal heart rate tracings and obstetrical management. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2015, Vol. 213, No. 6, pp. 856.e1–856.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.066
Shastry K.A., Gounder M.S., et al. Adaptive weighted diversity ensemble learning approach for fetal health classification on cardiotocography data. IEEE Access, 2024, Vol. 12, pp. 190690–190710. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3516880
Vejux N., Ledu R., et al. Guideline choice for CTG analysis influences first caesarean decision. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2017, Vol. 30, No. 15, pp. 1816–1819. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1228050
Wong W.K., Juwono F.H., et al. Fetal health prediction from cardiotocography recordings using Kolmogorov–Arnold networks. IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 2025, Vol. 6, pp. 345–351. DOI: 10.1109/OJEMB.2025.3549594
Zamora del Pozo C., Chóliz Ezquerro M., et al. Diagnostic capacity and interobserver variability in FIGO, ACOG, NICE and Chandraharan cardiotocographic guidelines to predict neonatal acidemia. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2022, Vol. 35, No. 25, pp. 8498–8506. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1986479