References
Bulygina T.A. Historical memory and research of locus in historical science. Humanities and Law Research, 2017, No. 1, pp. 8−12. (In Russ.)
Gavrishina O. History and theory, or the modern image of historical discipline. New Literary Review, 2002, No. 2(54). URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2002/2/istoriya-i-teoriya-ili-covremennyj-obraz-istoricheskoj-disczipliny.html (Accessed: 08.11.2023). (In Russ.)
Zapletin V.V., Zapletina S.N. The dialectics of historical consciousness, historical knowledge, and historical memory. Science today: problems and ways to solve them: Proceedings of the international conference. In 2 parts. Part 1. 2018, pp. 151−155. (In Russ.)
Ippolitov G.M., Filatov T.V. Extraordinary work of an extraordinary specialist: critical notes on the margins of one monograph. Samara Archivist: Scientific Almanac, 2023, No. 5, pp. 7−18. (In Russ.)
Nikonenko S.V. On simirarity and distinction between continental and analytical historicism. ACTA eruditorum, 2021, Issue 37, pp. 122−129. (In Russ.)
Semyonov Yu.I. History as a real process: historical science and philosophy of history. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 2016, No. 1(47), pp. 50−56. (In Russ.)
Smolensky N.I. About the study of the British scientist John Tosh into the problems of methodology of history. Libmonster Russia [website]. URL: https://libmonster.ru/m/articles/view/ОБ-ИССЛЕДОВАНИИ-БРИТАНСКИМ-УЧЕНЫМ-Дж-ТОШЕМ-ПРОБЛЕМ-МЕТОДОЛОГИИ-ИСТОРИИ (Accessed: 07.11.2023). (In Russ.)
Tosh J. The pursuit of truth. How to master the skills of a historian. Moscow, Ves mir, 2000, 296 p. (In Russ.)
White H. Metahistory: The historical imagination in nineteenth-century Europe. Yekaterinburg, Ural State University, 2002, 528 p. (In Russ.)
Halbwachs M. Collective and historical memory. The Untouchable Reserve, 2005, No. 2−3(40−41), pp. 8−27. (In Russ.)