No 3 (7): 27.

Economics and management

 2017

Scientific article
pdf-version

Anastasiia A. Boldyreva
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(St. Petersburg, ul. Polytechnic Str. 29),
anastasiaboldyreva96@gmail.com
Yuliya A. Yarunicheva
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(St. Petersburg, ul. Polytechnic Str. 29),
julija.jarunicheva@gmail.com
Mikhail Boldyrev
St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technologies, Mechanics and Optics
(St. Petersburg, Kronversky prospect, 49),
boldyrevm96@gmail.com

Comparative analysis of modern information technologies in project management

Paper submitted on: 05/19/2017;
Accepted on: 12/05/2017;
 Abstract. Twelve quite popular software for project management were considered in the article. The purpose of this work was to identify the most suitable and convenient program for a particular branch of the enterprise in a Russian-speaking environment. Some characteristics necessary to simplify the work in the program were taken, and their presence was revealed in selected computer and mobile applications. According to the obtained characteristics, a comparative analysis was carried out with the setting of a certain number of points for each parameter and the total rating of the software was compiled according to the sum of the points obtained. The article describes in detail the method of assigning points, the maximum possible number of them was determined by the importance of this option. For some options, separate, more objective for the analysis, ways of revealing the significance for the consumer are made up. The results of the work done are tabulated and diagrammed for simplicity and visibility of the presentation. Leaders of the compiled rating based on the results of the analysis were the following programs: Simple Business, Megaplan, Oracle Primavera. More detailed results can be found below.
Keywords: project management, software, information technology and automation; automated process control system

For citation: Boldyreva, A. A., Yarunicheva, Y. A., Boldyrev, M. Comparative analysis of modern information technologies in project management. StudArctic forum. 2017, 3 (7): 27.

References

1. Alexandrova SI, Shukenbaeva N.Sh., Shukenbaev A.B., Automation of testing the software product "Megaplan" // Modern high technology 2014, №5. Publishing house "Academy of Natural History" p. 202-204

2. Karpova VS, Melnikova EF, Planning and control of resources in the engineering company's projects using Oracle Primavera. // Collection of scientific articles of the 8th international scientific conference. Edited by V.V. Trofimova, V.F. Minakova. 2013 Info-yes publishing house c. 68-74

3. The cups. MO, Improvement of planning procedures in project management systems // Scientific notes of young researchers 2014, № 4. Publisher: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation (Moscow), p. 24-27

4. Oshurkov VA, Makashova VN, Implementation of the corporate service "Jira" as an element of the software project management system // Mathematical and software in the industrial and social spheres 2015, №1 p.61-66

5. Sokolova AA, Development of a system for managing the process of creating a software product // Modern information technology and IT education. 2015. T.2. No.11. P.146-149.

6. Smartsheet [electronic resource]. 2017. URL: https://ru.smartsheet.com.

7. Dobroserdov K.O. Role and relevance of automated risk management systems in IT project (for example, small business management) // New science: theoretical and practical view. 2016. №117-2. p. 138-140.

8. Butchenko EV Analysis of software tools for managing investment projects // Manager. 2017. № 1(65). p. 72-77

Displays: 9985; Downloads: 1;