No 1 (5): 0–13.

Architecture

 2017

Scientific article

UDK 72.725.9
pdf-version

Anastasiia Staritcyna
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29),
a.staritsyna@mail.ru
Elena A. Martinenko
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29),
martynenkoea@yandex.ru
Svetlana V. Vahrysheva
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29),
vakhrusheva.sveta@gmail.com
Irina S. Ptyhina
Peter the Great Saint-Petersburg Polytechnic University
(Russia, 195251, St.Petersburg, Polytechnicheskaya, 29),
irena_ptah@mail.ru

The analysis of the existing policy in the field of preservation and regeneration of cultural heritage objects

Paper submitted on: 04/27/2017;
Accepted on: 05/30/2017;
 Abstract. There is a set of ways of historical heritage preservation. Despite similar methods, in the different countries differently solve this problem. The main tendency at preservation of culture monuments is attraction of private funds or legal entities as creation of museum complexes habitual to all, most often, doesn't pay back costs of restoration and reconstruction. Techniques of preservation and reclaiming of objects of cultural heritage have been considered in article on the example of France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Russia. Also the regulating documents and methods of stimulation for attraction of investments have been analyzed.
Keywords: management of heritage; tourism; restoration; public-private partnership; historical and cultural heritage, development

For citation: Staritcyna, A. , Martinenko, E. A., Vahrysheva, S. V., Ptyhina, I. S. The analysis of the existing policy in the field of preservation and regeneration of cultural heritage objects. StudArctic forum. 2017, 1 (5): 0–13.

References

1. Zheravina O. A., Biblioteki florencii v kul'turnom nasledii Italii, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie, 1 ( 2011), s. 52-62.

2. Klimov L.A., Kul'turnoe nasledie kak sistema, Sankt-Peterburgskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. Voprosy muzeologii, 1 (2011), s. 42-46.

3. Borodkin L.I., Rumyantsev M.V., Lapteva M.A., The Virtual Reconstruction of the Objects of Historical and Cultural Heritage in the Format of the Scientifi c Research and Educational Process, Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Science, 7 (2016), pp. 1682-1689.

4. Urjutova Ju.A., Sohranenie nacional'no-kul'turnogo nasledija v uslovijah razvitija informacionnogo obshhestva (social'no-filosofskij aspekt), Obshhestvo: filosofija, istorija, kul'tura, 2 (2012), s. 17-20.

5. Brumann C., Cultural Heritage, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition) 2015, pp. 414–419

6. Soraya Boudia, , Sébastien Soubiran, Scientists and their cultural heritage: Knowledge, politics and ambivalent relationships, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(4) (2013), pp. 643-651.

7. Mateja Šmid Hribar. David Bole. Primož Pipan, Sustainable Heritage Management: Social, Economic and Other Potentials of Culture in Local Development, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 188 ( 2015 ), pp. 103 – 110

8. Galkova O.V., Teoreticheskie osnovy kul'turnogo nasledija, Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (2011), s. 110-114.

9. Vinnickij A.V., Pamjatniki istorii
i kul'tury: neobhodimo sohranjat' ili mozhno rekonstruirovat'?, Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika, ¬7 (2009), s. 65¬-69.

10. Dzhandzhugazova E.A., Konceptual'nye
oteli kak sredstvo sohranenija kul'turno- istoricheskogo nasledija, Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma, 4 (2008), s. 68-72.

11. Zhunich I.I., Ispol'zovanie kul'turnogo nasledija Junesko v sisteme turistskogo obrazovanija, Srednee professional'noe obrazovanie, 9 (2009), s. 7-9.

12. Tutur Lussetyowati, Preservation and Conservation through Cultural Heritage Tourism, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184 (2015), pp. 401 – 406.

13. Nagornaja M.S., Arhitektura socgoroda kak ob#ekt kul'turnogo nasledija: evropejskij opyt i rossiĭskie perspektivy, Upravlenie v sovremennyh sistemah, 4 (2014), s. 16-26.

14. Jakunin V.N., Razvitie religioznogo turizma kak sostavljajushhej chasti istoriko-kul'turnogo nasledija na sovremennom jetape, Vestnik SGTU, 4(60) (2011), s. 280-286.

15. Jaskevich E.E., Teorija i praktika ocenki zdanij-pamjatnikov kul'turnogo nasledija, Imushhestvennye otnoshenija v RF, 6(93) (2009), s. 70-88.

16. Litvinova O.G., Zarubezhnyj i otechestvennyj opyt sohranenija istoriko-kul'turnogo nasledija v konce xx – nachale XXI v., Vestnik TGASU, 4 (2010), s. 46-62

17. Smirnova T.B., Voprosy sohranenija kul'turnogo nasledija v dejatel'nosti mezhdunarodnogo sojuza nemeckoj kul'tury, Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (2012), s. 123-133.

18. Davliev I.G., Valeev R.M., Sistema sohranenija ob#ektov kul'turnogo nasledija v Anglii, Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 2-1 (2015), s. 1-6.

19. Mironova T.N., Sohranenie kul'turnogo i prirodnogo nasledija kak glavnaja cherta kul'turnoj politiki stran Evropejskogo regiona: Italija, Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 2 (2009), s. 41-48.

20. Bogoljubova N.M., Nikolaeva Ju.V., Ohrana kul'turnogo nasledija: mezhdunarodnyj i Rossijskij opyt, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 4(21) (2014), s 6-13.

Displays: 15839; Downloads: 1275;